<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: socialized music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gonze.com/blog/2009/03/20/socialized-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/03/20/socialized-music/</link>
	<description>internet music technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:02:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gurdonark</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/03/20/socialized-music/comment-page-1/#comment-3280</link>
		<dc:creator>gurdonark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=1405#comment-3280</guid>
		<description>All IP rights are government grants to promote a purpose, so I&#039;d see it less as &quot;socialized music&quot; than as the qualifiers placed upon the government 
protection granted. Kind of &quot;if you want this exclusive right, then you have to submit to this cool license&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All IP rights are government grants to promote a purpose, so I&#8217;d see it less as &#8220;socialized music&#8221; than as the qualifiers placed upon the government<br />
protection granted. Kind of &#8220;if you want this exclusive right, then you have to submit to this cool license&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gurdonark</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/03/20/socialized-music/comment-page-1/#comment-3278</link>
		<dc:creator>gurdonark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 03:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=1405#comment-3278</guid>
		<description>One could state it either way. Because it&#039;s an incident of a grant of an exclusive privilege through the copyright, then one could argue that its not &quot;nationalizing&quot; the industry, but instead placing a restriction on the grant of the exclusive by the sovereign. One could argue alternatively that it&#039;s socializing content that could instead be handled by letting the market set the value. The nomenclature is less important to me than a fair, workable system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could state it either way. Because it&#8217;s an incident of a grant of an exclusive privilege through the copyright, then one could argue that its not &#8220;nationalizing&#8221; the industry, but instead placing a restriction on the grant of the exclusive by the sovereign. One could argue alternatively that it&#8217;s socializing content that could instead be handled by letting the market set the value. The nomenclature is less important to me than a fair, workable system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

