<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: media apocalypse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gonze.com/blog/2009/06/12/media-apocalypse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/06/12/media-apocalypse/</link>
	<description>internet music technology since ~2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:34:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bs</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/06/12/media-apocalypse/comment-page-1/#comment-3487</link>
		<dc:creator>bs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=1731#comment-3487</guid>
		<description>People still watch lots of television. I bet if you reduced the amount of money people make, then the networks would make more, and that would make them happy again.
As for &quot;I would buy a radio station not because it makes money or could make money again, but because it has a brand — a real strong brand – that could lead into a digital media platform.&quot; Um, ok. Except that why would you buy something that you don&#039;t plan to make money with? Isn&#039;t that silly? Radio still makes money, but it&#039;s definitely declining rapidly. That said, people who say radio has no influence on music should look at the sales charts and the most played songs on radio. They&#039;re quite similar. How could that be the case if radio has no influence anymore? Every car has a radio, so the medium will be around for a long time. Whenever I read that &quot;everyone&quot; has an ipod or &quot;nobody&quot; listens to the radio anymore, I take that with a grain of salt. It&#039;s easy to become myopic and forget that there&#039;s a world out there of people who actually lost their television service in the digital conversion because they don&#039;t have cable, or who drive all day and leave the radio on. Some people even still read newspapers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People still watch lots of television. I bet if you reduced the amount of money people make, then the networks would make more, and that would make them happy again.<br />
As for &#8220;I would buy a radio station not because it makes money or could make money again, but because it has a brand — a real strong brand – that could lead into a digital media platform.&#8221; Um, ok. Except that why would you buy something that you don&#8217;t plan to make money with? Isn&#8217;t that silly? Radio still makes money, but it&#8217;s definitely declining rapidly. That said, people who say radio has no influence on music should look at the sales charts and the most played songs on radio. They&#8217;re quite similar. How could that be the case if radio has no influence anymore? Every car has a radio, so the medium will be around for a long time. Whenever I read that &#8220;everyone&#8221; has an ipod or &#8220;nobody&#8221; listens to the radio anymore, I take that with a grain of salt. It&#8217;s easy to become myopic and forget that there&#8217;s a world out there of people who actually lost their television service in the digital conversion because they don&#8217;t have cable, or who drive all day and leave the radio on. Some people even still read newspapers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sull</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/06/12/media-apocalypse/comment-page-1/#comment-3482</link>
		<dc:creator>sull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=1731#comment-3482</guid>
		<description>their needs to be a proper recognition of the shift more than on any collapse.  
some industries may be more sloppy than others during this shift but ultimately, the Internet and newer co-existing digital networks will be the TV, the Radio, the Theatre as we have known them... controlled, not free and ad friendly... since a meshing of the mediums will have occurred.

i&#039;m guessing the the basic internet will not change but the new media rich internet will be segmented as a differet zone with different game rules.  it cannot remain a mostly untapped commodity forever.. as big media industries start requiring presence as the home television sets start pumping in content from these on-demand infrastructures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>their needs to be a proper recognition of the shift more than on any collapse.<br />
some industries may be more sloppy than others during this shift but ultimately, the Internet and newer co-existing digital networks will be the TV, the Radio, the Theatre as we have known them&#8230; controlled, not free and ad friendly&#8230; since a meshing of the mediums will have occurred.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m guessing the the basic internet will not change but the new media rich internet will be segmented as a differet zone with different game rules.  it cannot remain a mostly untapped commodity forever.. as big media industries start requiring presence as the home television sets start pumping in content from these on-demand infrastructures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gurdonark</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/06/12/media-apocalypse/comment-page-1/#comment-3479</link>
		<dc:creator>gurdonark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=1731#comment-3479</guid>
		<description>The music industry will move toward gear and recording products.

The next hill is the movie industry. As technology improves, it will no longer require
x million to make a cinema-worthy film.

Hollywood seems to recognize that special fx &quot;big films&quot; are the thing that can&#039;t be done on a budget. 

But what will happen when small human-interest films can be done cheaply--and when the internet permits the creation of well-known indie film stars who draw in box office? 

A new paradigm--the end of the movie theater as we know it, the end of netflix and the DVD rental places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The music industry will move toward gear and recording products.</p>
<p>The next hill is the movie industry. As technology improves, it will no longer require<br />
x million to make a cinema-worthy film.</p>
<p>Hollywood seems to recognize that special fx &#8220;big films&#8221; are the thing that can&#8217;t be done on a budget. </p>
<p>But what will happen when small human-interest films can be done cheaply&#8211;and when the internet permits the creation of well-known indie film stars who draw in box office? </p>
<p>A new paradigm&#8211;the end of the movie theater as we know it, the end of netflix and the DVD rental places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
