<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: using up songs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gonze.com/blog/2009/07/06/using-up-songs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/07/06/using-up-songs/</link>
	<description>internet music technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:02:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gurdonark</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/07/06/using-up-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-3622</link>
		<dc:creator>gurdonark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=1834#comment-3622</guid>
		<description>The advocate in me cannot resist the point that the song which makes the best argument for and against this position is the same song: &quot;Macarena&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The advocate in me cannot resist the point that the song which makes the best argument for and against this position is the same song: &#8220;Macarena&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Fienberg</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/07/06/using-up-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-3617</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Fienberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=1834#comment-3617</guid>
		<description>To the degree the value of the resource is in its novelty (or newness), some songs get used up. They go from being new songs to no-longer-new songs to old songs.

But, not all songs are enjoyed simply because of their novelty.

I was watching that great Les Paul documentary last night, and there&#039;s a whole big section of his career that is pre-1950s, where everyone is doing versions of the same song over and over. And, there&#039;s this pressure to come out with new compositions, but also with new versions of already well-known compositions. The novelty then was certainly as much about &quot;Les Paul and Mary Ford doing their take on the Tiger Rag&quot; than about them writing new composition, if not more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the degree the value of the resource is in its novelty (or newness), some songs get used up. They go from being new songs to no-longer-new songs to old songs.</p>
<p>But, not all songs are enjoyed simply because of their novelty.</p>
<p>I was watching that great Les Paul documentary last night, and there&#8217;s a whole big section of his career that is pre-1950s, where everyone is doing versions of the same song over and over. And, there&#8217;s this pressure to come out with new compositions, but also with new versions of already well-known compositions. The novelty then was certainly as much about &#8220;Les Paul and Mary Ford doing their take on the Tiger Rag&#8221; than about them writing new composition, if not more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

