<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: subs #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gonze.com/blog/2009/09/14/subs-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/09/14/subs-2/</link>
	<description>internet music technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:02:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gurdonark</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/09/14/subs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3884</link>
		<dc:creator>gurdonark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=2004#comment-3884</guid>
		<description>I do not yet know whether the ultimate delivery model is subscription, ad-based, unit-sale based or otherwise.  I have my theories, which are no better than, and perhaps worse than, anyone else&#039;s.

I do know that down-sizing in sales revenue from CDs is a 
huge problem for the corporations that profited from those sales. Yet I remain convinced that the consumer will find herself/himself with more choices in this newer world than in the old way.

I remember when digital watches moved from 200 dollars/unit to less than 20/unit. Yet watchmaking corporations stayed in business by offering marquee products and added features. We see a very similar evolution of the business model now in digital cameras and other consumer electronics. The issue for unit-sale or subscription sellers is &quot;what value will we add to get buyers to pay the fees we wish?&quot;. The &quot;value&quot; of shelf hegemony and distribution control, which was adverse to the consumer, proved inadequate. This is not a tragedy. It&#039;s a refreshing example of technology destroying a market hegemony
using free market principles. 

The question now is what a wide-open market will let more innovative 
companies and individuals do to get more music released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not yet know whether the ultimate delivery model is subscription, ad-based, unit-sale based or otherwise.  I have my theories, which are no better than, and perhaps worse than, anyone else&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I do know that down-sizing in sales revenue from CDs is a<br />
huge problem for the corporations that profited from those sales. Yet I remain convinced that the consumer will find herself/himself with more choices in this newer world than in the old way.</p>
<p>I remember when digital watches moved from 200 dollars/unit to less than 20/unit. Yet watchmaking corporations stayed in business by offering marquee products and added features. We see a very similar evolution of the business model now in digital cameras and other consumer electronics. The issue for unit-sale or subscription sellers is &#8220;what value will we add to get buyers to pay the fees we wish?&#8221;. The &#8220;value&#8221; of shelf hegemony and distribution control, which was adverse to the consumer, proved inadequate. This is not a tragedy. It&#8217;s a refreshing example of technology destroying a market hegemony<br />
using free market principles. </p>
<p>The question now is what a wide-open market will let more innovative<br />
companies and individuals do to get more music released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

