<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: subscriptions vs sheets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gonze.com/blog/2009/09/14/subscriptions-vs-sheets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/09/14/subscriptions-vs-sheets/</link>
	<description>internet music technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:25:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aram</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/09/14/subscriptions-vs-sheets/comment-page-1/#comment-3862</link>
		<dc:creator>aram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=1993#comment-3862</guid>
		<description>As an early advocate of subs, I still have a weak spot in my heart for the biz model. I think there&#039;s still a substantial potential customer base for them, especially if they include (a) unlimited DRM-free downloads (which UMG has already gotten behind), and (b) streaming to mobile devices, with caching, a la Spotify. Obviously, the market size won&#039;t be anywhere near $40B global (record retail at its peak), especially in the early years of deployment, so they need to be integrated with other revenue models, from ad-based to licensing, and supported by 360 artist management.

All that being said, your math is off. 

25mm subs x $10/month is actually $3b per year, not $250mm. Which is a pretty nice chunk o&#039; change. And 100mm people at $20/month (which I believe is an unfeasible price) would actually deliver $24B in annual revenues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an early advocate of subs, I still have a weak spot in my heart for the biz model. I think there&#8217;s still a substantial potential customer base for them, especially if they include (a) unlimited DRM-free downloads (which UMG has already gotten behind), and (b) streaming to mobile devices, with caching, a la Spotify. Obviously, the market size won&#8217;t be anywhere near $40B global (record retail at its peak), especially in the early years of deployment, so they need to be integrated with other revenue models, from ad-based to licensing, and supported by 360 artist management.</p>
<p>All that being said, your math is off. </p>
<p>25mm subs x $10/month is actually $3b per year, not $250mm. Which is a pretty nice chunk o&#8217; change. And 100mm people at $20/month (which I believe is an unfeasible price) would actually deliver $24B in annual revenues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

