<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playdar pitch 0.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gonze.com/blog/2009/11/05/playdar-pitch-0-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/11/05/playdar-pitch-0-1/</link>
	<description>internet music technology since ~2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gonze</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/11/05/playdar-pitch-0-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4811</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gonze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=2170#comment-4811</guid>
		<description>Hey Daniel, yeah, the install is way too gnarly right now.  It took me a ridiculously long time to get the Erlang version up and running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Daniel, yeah, the install is way too gnarly right now.  It took me a ridiculously long time to get the Erlang version up and running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/11/05/playdar-pitch-0-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4674</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=2170#comment-4674</guid>
		<description>Forget the pitch, do the screencast.

Having had to download, build, etc the version of Playdar to even see what it was, I could have sidestepped all of that by watching it on youtube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget the pitch, do the screencast.</p>
<p>Having had to download, build, etc the version of Playdar to even see what it was, I could have sidestepped all of that by watching it on youtube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/11/05/playdar-pitch-0-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4670</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=2170#comment-4670</guid>
		<description>I even think it even has to be dumbed down for tech bloggers, journalists, and computer professionals..  You and I traffic in the intersection of music and tech..  Not sure of the top-bullets either?  Try these variations:

It&#039;s scalable because it&#039;s leveraging the peer-serving capabilities of every computer that uses it.

It helps music-serving sites to dramatically reduce costs (see first bullet).

Not sure the third bullet is a proposition that matters?  Perhaps it needs to be said differently..  

I like pitching a new, sexy concepts that are easy to visualize in a logo..  It&#039;s the first product that enables &#039;cross-streaming&#039;..  It&#039;s a cross-streaming application that enables users to cross-mix streams of music they own with new streams of music from any source on earth...  

This product (it seems to me) would be cooler than it already is if you added acoustic recommendation to it.  You could crunch the songs on the client side and then send the &#039;seeds&#039; to the server for recommendations.. Look up Queen Mary&#039;s SoundBite technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I even think it even has to be dumbed down for tech bloggers, journalists, and computer professionals..  You and I traffic in the intersection of music and tech..  Not sure of the top-bullets either?  Try these variations:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s scalable because it&#8217;s leveraging the peer-serving capabilities of every computer that uses it.</p>
<p>It helps music-serving sites to dramatically reduce costs (see first bullet).</p>
<p>Not sure the third bullet is a proposition that matters?  Perhaps it needs to be said differently..  </p>
<p>I like pitching a new, sexy concepts that are easy to visualize in a logo..  It&#8217;s the first product that enables &#8216;cross-streaming&#8217;..  It&#8217;s a cross-streaming application that enables users to cross-mix streams of music they own with new streams of music from any source on earth&#8230;  </p>
<p>This product (it seems to me) would be cooler than it already is if you added acoustic recommendation to it.  You could crunch the songs on the client side and then send the &#8217;seeds&#8217; to the server for recommendations.. Look up Queen Mary&#8217;s SoundBite technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gonze</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/11/05/playdar-pitch-0-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4669</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gonze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=2170#comment-4669</guid>
		<description>No doubt!  

But the consumer pitch is a different thing.  For consumers you need to lead with benefits that are very concrete.  Being able to do that is still 6-12 months away.

It always blows my mind that consumers are so literal about software.  It&#039;s really hard for computer people to see things in that way.  

So, assuming that what I have here is for tech bloggers, journalists, and computer professionals, do you think that all the points are accurate, that nothing important is missing, and that the language is effective?  Suggestions welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt!  </p>
<p>But the consumer pitch is a different thing.  For consumers you need to lead with benefits that are very concrete.  Being able to do that is still 6-12 months away.</p>
<p>It always blows my mind that consumers are so literal about software.  It&#8217;s really hard for computer people to see things in that way.  </p>
<p>So, assuming that what I have here is for tech bloggers, journalists, and computer professionals, do you think that all the points are accurate, that nothing important is missing, and that the language is effective?  Suggestions welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://gonze.com/blog/2009/11/05/playdar-pitch-0-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4668</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonze.com/blog/?p=2170#comment-4668</guid>
		<description>In the end, the consumer pitch for this is going to have to be dead simple stupid (which you know)..

1) Download it
2) Connect to your favorite streaming service (optional)
3) Adjust your mix (between what you already own and new songs)
4) Listen anywhere
5) Cross-mix with friends 

-Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, the consumer pitch for this is going to have to be dead simple stupid (which you know)..</p>
<p>1) Download it<br />
2) Connect to your favorite streaming service (optional)<br />
3) Adjust your mix (between what you already own and new songs)<br />
4) Listen anywhere<br />
5) Cross-mix with friends </p>
<p>-Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
